What does project 2025 say abt gay marraige

Project includes no policy proposals that would forbid gay marriage. However, several of its proposals would roll back anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people and favor federal funding and support for heterosexual marriages over gay marriage. If implemented, Project would dismantle antidiscrimination protections by removing terms such as "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" from federal laws, allowing for legal.

As it is outlined in a page document titled "Mandate for Leadership," Project includes no proposal to eliminate same-sex marriage. The document refers to heterosexual families as "ideal". Project does not directly call for an end to same-sex marriage rights. Although the mandate describes same-sex marriages as unhealthy for children (which is untrue), it does not directly mention a ban on same-sex marriages, or talk about a plan to eliminate marriage equality.

Project ’s invocation of child protection undermines the basic premise on which America’s LGBTQ+ rights advances were built.

Project , Explained | American Civil Liberties Union

The anti-queer child protection narrative dates back at least. Learn more about this initiative and its perilous implications for our civil rights and civil liberties below — as well as how the ACLU will use all of the tools at its disposal — from advocacy to litigation to community organizing — to defend our democracy. Project Offers Dystopian View of America.

The ACLU is already litigating the scope of federal nondiscrimination coverage for LGBTQ people in the courts, and we will continue to sue to protect the broad scope of these federal civil rights laws if a new Trump administration tries to narrow it. Learn more about The Heritage Foundation initiative that threatens to erode our civil rights and civil liberties during a second Trump term.

Moving Forward As we reflect on the beginning of the new administration, we can see how they are using Project as a template to advance their Christian nationalist agenda. For instance, the group says, it could override critical state-level protections, arguing state laws that protect transgender students violate the federal statutory rights of non-transgender students.

Donate to the ACLU. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. Since then, both federal courts and federal agencies have interpreted other federal statutory bans on sex discrimination to bar anti-LGBTQ discrimination as well, including in the contexts of health care, education, and housing.

They know how to build safety, community, and care among one another, and the ACLU has a century-long history of representing, supporting, and advocating for the powerless, the silenced, the marginalized, and the unapologetically queer against the kinds of attacks outlined in this report. Just as the Trump administration did ina second Trump administration would reverse policies allowing transgender people to serve openly in the military.

The Plan Censor academic discussions about race, gender, and systemic oppression Second Trump Administration Connections Linda McMahon Secretary of Education Plans to send education back to the states and has actively championed anti-trans rhetoric. The Plan Abuse executive power to interfere in our elections by criminalizing the voting process and damaging fair representation Second Trump Administration Connections Pam Bondi Attorney General As co-chair for the America First Policy Institute's Center for Law and Justice, she has spearheaded efforts to restrict and disenfranchise voters.

A second Trump administration would attempt to halt gender-affirming medical care for adolescents nationwide by threatening to deny Medicaid funding for hospitals that provide that care, asserting — against the recommendations of all major medical associations — that it does not meet federal health and safety standards. Chair of the board at the America First Policy Institute, a conservative think tank she launched with what doe project 2025 say abt gay marraige Trump administration officials.

Unleashing Undue Force on Protestors. The plan does not specifically target marriage equality. Organizing in communities to educate the public about their rights, the harms of Projectand what they can do to protect and expand our freedoms For more info, visit aclu. Citations and endnotes can be found in the full, downloadable PDF. Four years of the first Trump presidency had an enormous impact on the courts, including the Supreme Court.

We will engage on every advocacy front, including mobilizing and organizing our network of millions of ACLU members and activists in every state to work to protect LGBTQ people from the dangerous policies of a second Trump administration. Gutting Abortion Access. As detailed below, many of the planned anti-LGBTQ policies of a second Trump administration would violate the Constitution and federal law, such that litigation would be a significant part of our response.

The Plan Remove federal nondiscrimination protections Mandate discrimination against LGBTQ people by the federal government Exclude trans people from serving in the military Permit faith-based, taxpayer-funded contracts to exclude trans people from disaster assistance and care for unaccompanied refugee Second Trump Administration Connections Pam Bondi U.

Such a discriminatory policy would also violate the Equal Protection Clause because it should be subjected to heightened equal protection scrutiny, and there is no justification for excluding transgender what doe project 2025 say abt gay marraige from service. A blueprint for discrimination Written by the Heritage Foundationa conservative think tank, Project is a playbook for the next conservative president.

End birthright citizenship. However, states can and should lay down clear markers that their own laws and constitutions require protection of transgender people both to provide practical protections at least for a time and to create the opportunity for political organizing and mobilization when and if the Trump administration tries to override those state protections.